Rodriguez v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 117 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). · Go Syfert
Rodriguez v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 117 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Kenny Rodriguez
v.
Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Queens County
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 21, 2014.
117 A.D.3d 958
Dillon, Duffy, Maltese, Sgroi.
Published

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent Steven Paynter, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, from continuing the suppression hearing in a criminal action entitled People v Rodriguez, pending under Queens County indictment No. 10088/13.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]).

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to[*959] the relief sought.

Dillon, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.