Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 222 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). · Go Syfert
Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 222 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) JSC Mgt. Group, LLC v. West Gen. Contrs., LLC (3×)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · confidence medium
Co. , 222 AD2d 1029, 1031-1032 [4th Dept 1995]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cooper v. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance
N.Y. App. Div. · 2010 · confidence medium
Co., 222 AD2d 1029, 1032 [1995] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Pavia v State Farm Mut.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Griffith Oil Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · confidence medium
Co., 222 AD2d 1029, 1032 [1995]).
discussed Cited "see" Evans v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
“The mere fact that a fall is unwitnessed does not require denial of a motion for partial summary judgment [on liability] under Labor Law § 240 (1)” (Abramo v Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Co., 224 AD2d 980, 981 [1996]; see Barrowman v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 222 AD2d 1029 [1995]; Morris, 203 AD2d at 923 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glenn R. Barrowman
v.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 22, 1995.
222 A.D.2d 1029
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiff alleges that he was injured when he lost his balance while standing on a diagonal brace and fell some 12 feet to a concrete floor, striking his chest or ribs on a scaffolding plank as he fell. Defendant failed to come forward with evidence controverting plaintiff’s version of the accident and did not conduct an investigation of the accident. Plaintiffs version is supported by the affidavit of a co-worker stating that he heard plaintiff fall and observed plaintiffs injury within minutes of the fall. Under those circumstances, the fact that plaintiffs fall was unwitnessed does not preclude summary judgment (see, Niles v Shue Roofing Co., 219 AD2d 785; Desouter v HRH Constr. Corp., 216 AD2d 249; McLean v Vahue & Son Bldrs., 210 AD2d 999; Madigan v United Parcel Serv., 193 AD2d 1102). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Labor Law.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.