Superintendent of Ins. of New York v. Digirol, 223 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). · Go Syfert
Superintendent of Ins. of New York v. Digirol, 223 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) East Dr. Hous. Dev. Corp. v. Lawrence
N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. · 2024 · confidence medium
Happy Garden Corp., 216 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2023] citing Kutner v Feiden, Dweck, & Sladkus, 223 AD2d 488, 489 (1st Dept 1996]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) LW Holdco V LLC v. Puls
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 2023 · confidence medium
CPLR 3126 authorizes the court to sanction a party who "refuses to obey an order for disclosure or willfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed." The failure to comply with discovery, particularly after a court order has been issued, may constitute "dilatory and obstructive, and thus contumacious, conduct warranting the striking of [a party's pleading]" ( Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus , 223 AD2d 488, 489 [1st Dept 1998]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Yellowbook, Inc. v. Heller & Heller
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · confidence medium
Defendants’ behavior, and their failure to offer a reasonable excuse for it, supported the motion court’s finding of willfulness (see Fish & Richardson, P.C. v Schindler, 75 AD3d 219, 221-222 [1st Dept 2010]; Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus, 223 AD2d 488, 489 [1st Dept 1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 802 [1996]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Reidel v. Ryder TRS, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · confidence medium
Here, the disobeying of three successive court orders by Finnegan and Zoccolo, directing them to appear for depositions “constituted precisely the sort of dilatory and obstructive, and thus contumacious, conduct warranting the striking of their answers” (Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus, 223 AD2d 488, 489 [1996], lv denied 88 NY2d 802 [1996]; accord Varvitsiotes v Pierre, 260 AD2d 297 [1999]).
cited Cited "see" A.B. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn
N.Y. Sup. Kings · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus, 223 AD2d 488 (1 st Dept 1998).
cited Cited "see" D.B. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn
N.Y. Sup. Kings · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus. 223 AD2d 488 (1 st Dept 1998).
cited Cited "see" M.B. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn
N.Y. Sup. Kings · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kutner v Feiden, Dweck & Sladkus, 223 AD2d 488 (1 st Dept 1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Liquidation of Transit Casualty Company. Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as Ancillary Receiver
v.
Alan Digirol
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 25, 1996.
223 A.D.2d 488
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered July 26, 1994, which denied claimant’s motion, granted the cross motion of the New York State Superintendent of Insurance, as Ancillary Receiver of Transit Casualty Company, disaffirmed the Referee’s report and upheld the Superintendent’s determination disallowing payment of post-liquidation interest, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Claimant failed to articulate his present claim that the Superintendent’s determination constituted an unconstitutional taking of property, and the issue is therefore improperly raised on appeal (see, Melahn v Hearn, 60 NY2d 944, 945). Were we to reach the argument, we would find claimant’s contention to be without merit. There is no constitutional right to interest payments. That right is purely statutory and in derogation of the common law (see, In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litig., 971 F2d 831, 851). Insurance Law § 7434 (b) expressly prohibits the payment of interest to a creditor due to delay in receiving payment of the principal claim, unless the liquidated company has sufficient assets to pay all creditors. Furthermore, the legislative history indicates that the precursor to Insurance Law § 7434 (b), which had substantially the same language, was enacted specifically to overrule Matter of Consolidated Indem. & Ins. Co. (256 App Div 604, affd 281 NY 680), which allowed a creditor to recover interest on his claim where, as here, the Superintendent had unsuccessfully litigated the claim. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.