People v. Allen, 224 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). · Go Syfert
People v. Allen, 224 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Harold Allen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 5, 1996.
224 A.D.2d 434
Published

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), rendered January 26, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[*435] Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Because the defendant made no objection at trial to the court’s charge regarding witness credibility, the issue of the propriety of the charge is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Gomez, 67 NY2d 843). In any event, we are satisfied that the charge was proper (see, People v Edey, 180 AD2d 694; cf., People v Holmes, 215 AD2d 163). Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.