Abramo v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 224 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Abramo v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 224 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Boyer v. Boyer
N.Y. App. Div. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
Upon his review of respondent’s objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order, the Family Court Judge was empowered to “make, with or without holding a new hearing, his * * * own findings of fact and order” (Family Ct Act § 439 [e] [ii]; see, Matter of Hughes v Wasik, 224 AD2d 982 ; Matter of Lucille Ann D. v David F. K., 219 AD2d 874, 875).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony A. Abramo
v.
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company, Defendants P.A.T. Construction, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent v. C & C Plumbing, Inc., Third-Party
Appeal No. 2.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 2, 1996.
224 A.D.2d 982
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Abramo v Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Co. (224 AD2d 980 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Indemnification.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.