green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Hill
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the People established the reasonableness of the lineup identification procedure, and defendant failed to meet his ultimate burden of establishing that the lineup was unduly suggestive (see People v Snell, 118 AD3d 1350, 1350 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 965 [2014]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Hill
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the People established the reasonableness of the lineup identification procedure, and defendant failed to meet his ultimate burden of establishing that the lineup was unduly suggestive (see People v Snell, 118 AD3d 1350, 1350 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 965 [2014]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Michael J. Massucco
v.
Michael J. Massucco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 13, 2014.
Centra, Dejoseph, Fahey, Peradotto, Sconiers.
Published
Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered March 21, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant,[*1351] upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree (three counts), petit larceny (two counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Present — Centra, J.P, Fahey, Peradotto, Sconiers and DeJoseph, JJ.