Powertech Tech. Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Powertech Tech. Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (40 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dror v. Kenu, Inc. (cand, 2019-11-01)
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Dror v. Kenu, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2019 · confidence medium
Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Abbvie Inc. v. Medimmune Limited
Fed. Cir. · 2018 · confidence medium
In Powertech Technology Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., the parties disputed whether royalty obligations under a contract were contingent on the validity and infringement of a patent. 660 F.3d 1301, 1308-10 (Fed.
cited Cited as authority (rule) First Data Corporation v. Inselberg
Fed. Cir. · 2017 · confidence medium
Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Asia Vital Components Co. v. Asetek Danmark A/S
Fed. Cir. · 2016 · confidence medium
Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Microsoft Corporation v. Itc
Fed. Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1308 (Fed.
examined Cited as authority (rule) Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Alberta Telecommunications Research Centre (10×) also: Cited "see"
N.D. Cal. · 2012 · confidence medium
Id. at 1377.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Powertech Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. (2×)
N.D. Cal. · 2012 · confidence medium
See Opp. to Mot. to Dismiss, Powertech Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. (PTI I), Case No. 10-945 (N.D.Cal.), Docket No. 33; Powertech Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1304 (Fed.Cir.2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.
Okla. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Powertech Technology Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1309-1310 (Fed.Cir.2011), (explaining that in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 135-136 , 127 S.Ct. 764 , 166 L.Ed.2d 604 (2007), the Court stated that the issue of contract interpretation is a merits issue, and not appropriate for a decision on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1)). 17 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C. (3×)
Okla. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See , e.g. , Powertech Technology Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. , 660 F.3d 1301, 1309-1310 (Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Powertech Technology Inc.
v.
Tessera, Inc.
19-1967.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Feb 3, 2011.
660 F.3d 1301
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Unpublished

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC., Plain,tiff-Appellan,t, V. TESSERA, INC., Defenclant-Appellee. 2010-1489 Appeal from the United States District Court for the N0rthern District of California in case no. 10-CV-0945, Judge C1audia Wi1ken. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to withdraw Ken- neth E. Krosin and to substitute Ge0rge C. Beck as prin- cipal counsel for POWertech Techno10gy Inc., IT IS ORDERED THATZ The motion is granted George C. Beck should promptly file a new entry of appearance as principal counsel

POWERTECH V. TESSERA FEB 03 2011 CC. S Date Kenneth E. Kr0sin, Esq. Ge0rge C. Beck, Esq. Morgan Chu, Esq. 2 FOR THE COURT /s/ J an H0rba1__v; J an Horba1y Clerk me U.8. COURT EALS F0'R THE FE`D€§lL (i`»,I'RCUIT FEB 03 2011 woman am