POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC. v. Tessera, Inc. (2011)

green · 40 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 9

Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

201220192026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Abbvie Inc. v. Medimmune Limited (2018)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.

In Powertech Technology Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., the parties disputed whether royalty obligations under a contract were contingent on the validity and infringement of a patent. 660 F.3d 1301, 1308-10 (Fed.

green First Data Corporation v. Inselberg (2017)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.

Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.

green Asia Vital Components Co. v. Asetek Danmark A/S (2016)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.

Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.

green Microsoft Corporation v. Itc (2014)

Rule Authority · Fed. Cir.

Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1308 (Fed.

this court’s rulings in cases coming from the Commission have precedential effect on the parties in related litigation

green Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Alberta Telecommunications Research Centre (2012)

Rule Authority · N.D. Cal. · 10 citations in this opinion

Id. at 1377.

green Powertech Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. (2012)

Rule Authority · N.D. Cal. · 2 citations in this opinion

See Opp. to Mot. to Dismiss, Powertech Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. (PTI I), Case No. 10-945 (N.D.Cal.), Docket No. 33; Powertech Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1304 (Fed.Cir.2011).

green Dror v. Kenu, Inc. (2019)

Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.

Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.

green TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C. (2014)

Cited (see also) · Okla. · signal: see, e.g. · 3 citations in this opinion

See , e.g. , Powertech Technology Inc. v. Tessera, Inc. , 660 F.3d 1301, 1309-1310 (Fed.

green TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C. (2014)

Cited (see also) · Okla. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Powertech Technology Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301, 1309-1310 (Fed.Cir.2011), (explaining that in MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 135-136 , 127 S.Ct. 764 , 166 L.Ed.2d 604 (2007), the Court stated that the issue of contract interpretation is a merits issue, and not appropriate for a decision on a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1)). 17 .