ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., 249 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., 249 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH
v.
Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 29, 1998.
249 A.D.2d 983
Published

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in grant[*984] ing a conditional order of protection (see, Nama Air Cargo Co. v Unitrans Consol., 208 AD2d 604, 605; see also, Oneto v Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 65 AD2d 520, 521). The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Blumenthal v Tops Friendly Mkts., 182 AD2d 1105, 1106; Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169, 1170). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.