Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Kirk
Any prejudice to the defendant that might have arisen from the detective’s testimony was alleviated when the Supreme Court gave a prompt curative instruction (see People v Vincent, 250 AD2d 787, 788 [1998]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Allen Tatum
v.
Allen Tatum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 18, 1998.
Published
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Corso, J.), rendered July 3, 1996, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.