In re Argenis N., 257 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
In re Argenis N., 257 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Matter of Mondy E. (nyappdiv, 2014-10-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Matter of Mondy E.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Contrary to the presentment agency’s contention, under these circumstances, the appellant was not barred from invoking the defense of justification based on self-defense (see Penal Law § 35.15 [1] [b]; People v Petty, 7 NY3d at 285 n 4; cf. Matter of Argenis N., 257 AD2d 488, 489 [1999]; People v Nettles, 118 AD2d 875 [1986]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Argenis N., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 21, 1999.
257 A.D.2d 488
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.),[*489] entered on or about December 23, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and conditionally discharged her for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The court properly rejected appellant’s justification defense. The evidence permitted the fact finder to conclude that appellant instigated the confrontation between herself and the complainant, struck the first blow in that confrontation, and did not withdraw from the confrontation. Consequently, the justification defense was not available (see, People v Baez, 118 AD2d 507; Penal Law § 35.15 [1] [b]). Moreover, the alleged threat to appellant’s safety was sufficiently attenuated in time and space to militate against the conclusion that she was in danger when she bit the complainant. Concur—Eosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Tom and Saxe, JJ.