Florida Statute 35.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 35.15

35.15 Decisions to be filed; copies to be furnished.—All decisions and opinions delivered by the district courts of appeal, or any judge thereof, relating to any action or proceeding pending in such court must be filed in the office of the clerk and maintained in the control of the clerk. Such decisions and opinions may not be taken from the clerk’s maintenance or control except by order of the court; however, the clerk must furnish certified copies of such opinions and decisions to any person who makes such a request, upon receiving any required fees.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 200, ch. 95-147; s. 5, ch. 2021-230.

F.S. 35.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.15 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.15

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.15

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.15.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 35.15

Total Results: 7

EAR v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-30

Citation: 4 So. 3d 614, 2009 WL 217979

Snippet: 318, Fla. Stat. (2007); Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.030, 8.035. [15] See § 812.014(1), (2)(c)1., Fla. Stat. (2006)

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1995-08-25

Snippet: Contiguous Zone, 15 U.S.T. 1606." 33 C.F.R. § 2.05-10. 35 15 U.S.T. 1606, T.I.A.S. No. 5639. 36 United States

FLA. EXPORT TOBACCO v. Dept. of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-06-26

Citation: 510 So. 2d 936

Snippet: warranto. See 50 Fla. Jur.2d Taxation §§ 11:32-11:35, 15:1-15:17, 13:22-26 (1983). My assumption that all

Carter Opticians, Inc. v. Davis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-01-04

Citation: 367 So. 2d 227, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 13945

Snippet: Davis was indebted to appellant for the sum of $35.15 for the glasses she ordered. On Davis’ counterclaim

215-22nd Street, Inc. v. Board of Business Regulation, Division of Beverage of the Department of Business Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-04-20

Citation: 330 So. 2d 821, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15100

Snippet: minimum, $19.50 for each small bottle of wine, and $35.15 for each large bottle of wine. The agents paid the

Ratliff v. Nowery, Admrx.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-10-01

Citation: 136 So. 895, 102 Fla. 1072

Snippet: defenses are applicable to each. 8 R. C. L. 31, Sec. 35; 15 C. J. 1424, Sec. 143. As to multifariousness as

State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-11-21

Citation: 72 Fla. 379

Snippet: comprising about 568 miles of road, cost $21,112,035.15. The evidence nowhere shows what portion of the