The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Penal Law § 35.15 (1) (same); Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.209 (same); S.D. . . .
. . . . § 35.15(2)(a); see also Bonilla v. Lee, 35 F.Supp.3d 551, 563 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15— was actually litigated or otherwise placed in issue in the prior proceeding. . . . Penal Law § 35.15 (McKinney). . . .
. . . Pro. art 35.15(a). . . .
. . . Under New York Penal Law § 35.15, a justification charge is warranted if “any reasonable view of the . . . Penal Law § 35.15(l)(b), (2)(a). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15; see also In re Graham, 455 B.R. 227 (Bankr.D.Colo.2011) (stating that the “[d]efendant . . . Penal Law § 35.15 (emphasis added). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a), deadly physical force cannot be used if retreat can be made in complete safety . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1); see also People v. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15; see also Jackson v. Edwards, 404 F.3d 612, 623 (2d Cir.2005). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1)(b). . . .
. . . nearly exhausted her twelve weeks of FMLA leave and had negative balances of 233 hours of sick leave and 35.15 . . .
. . . nearly exhausted her twelve weeks of FMLA leave and had negative balances of 233 hours of sick leave and 35.15 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1), though “[a] person may not use deadly physical force upon another person ... unless . . . other person is using or about to use deadly physical force” or certain other conditions are met, id. § 35.15 . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 35.15(2) provides in relevant part that a person may not use deadly physical force . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . .
. . . remaining, and that she currently had negative leaves balances of 233 hours of sick leave and negative 35.15 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1) (McKinney 2004). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15 states, “A person may ... use physical force upon another person when and to the extent . . . Penal Law § 35.15, thus negating a finding of probable cause. . . .
. . . . § 35.15 (requiring notice and filing with FERC to cancel or terminate a rate schedule). . . . Id.; 18 C.F.R. § 35.15. . . .
. . . . § 35.15 (“When a rate schedule, tariff or service agreement or part thereof required to be on file . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a)). . . .
. . . Consequently, upon reconsideration, we reject the Arbitrator’s requirement to increase demand by 35.15 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15, and the defense of extreme emotional disturbance, which is a partial affirmative defense . . .
. . . Code Crim Proc. art. 35.15(b). . . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 35.15 provides that the use of force is justified in the following circumstances . . . Penal Law § 35.15 (McKinney 1997). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a)). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . .
. . . and use of force are not the same, and justification, by the very words of the statute (Penal Law § 35.15 . . . does not involve the use of physical force, there are no circumstances when justification (Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a), and the defensive use of deadly physical force against a rape or sodomy, or . . . attempt to commit a rape or sodomy, id., § 35.15(2)(b). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a); see People v. . . .
. . . locality-based pay differentials between the Washington-Baltimore area (+24.22%) and the San Francisco area ( + 35.15% . . .
. . . . § 35.15(1). . Id. § 35.15(2)(a). . Id. § 35.15(2)(a)(i). . Jackson v. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15, and the defense of extreme emotional disturbance, which is a partial affirmative defense . . .
. . . a jury instruction on the defense of justification (self-defense) pursuant to New York Penal Law § 35.15 . . . court should have given an “initial aggressor” charge as part of its instruction pursuant to P.L. § 35.15 . . . "Penal Law § 35.15(1) provides that 'a person may ... use physical force upon another person when and . . . Penal Law §35.15(1) applies only to the use of non-deadly physical force. . . . The use of deadly physical force is governed by Penal Law § 35.15(2), which provides that ‘[a] person . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15; see generally, People v. . . . Specifically, New York Penal Law § 35.15(1) provides that “[a] person may, subject to the provisions . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a)). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a) reversible error. Id. (citing, inter alia, People v. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a).” Jackson v. Edwards, 404 F.3d at 623 (other internal citations omitted). . . . .
. . . 707, 563 N.E.2d 21 (citing Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d at 112, 506 N.Y.S.2d 18, 497 N.E.2d 41), and Penal Law § 35.15 . . . Penal Law § 35.15 (McKinney 1975 & Supp.1987); Johnson v. . . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . . New York Penal Law § 35.15(2) provides in pertinent part with respect to the defense of justification . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . . .
. . . . § 35.15(1), (2). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). A punch is considered ordinary, physical force. People v. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . . Penal Law § 35.15 defines the justification defense in relevant part as follows: 1. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15. See also Jackson v. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(l)(b) N.Y. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1)0) (providing an exception permitting an initial aggressor to claim self defense . . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1)(b) (providing that the justification of self-defense is not available to an initial . . . Penal Law § 35.15(l)(b) (providing an exception whereby an initial aggressor may claim self-defense “ . . .
. . . justification charge was appropriate based on “any reasonable view of the evidence” under N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15 . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(l)(a)-(e). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a)(i). This claim is dismissed. E. . . .
. . . PENAL LAW § 35.15(2)(a). . . .
. . . Under New York Penal Law (hereinafter “NYPL”) § 35.15(1), an individual is permitted to use force upon . . . NYPL § 35.15(2)(a). . . . justification as follows: To determine whether a defendant’s conduct was justified under Penal Law § 35.15 . . . Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96, 114-15, 506 N.Y.S.2d 18, 497 N.E.2d 41 (1986) ] that Penal Law § 35.15 requires . . .
. . . New York’s self-defense statute is set forth in Penal Law § 35.15. . . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a); People v. Collice, 41 N.Y.2d at 907, 394 N.Y.S.2d 615, 363 N.E.2d 340). B. . . . Penal Law § 35.15 provides that a person is justified in using physical force in self-defense under the . . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . .
. . . Such program shall be administered within the facilities of the jail. 35.15 The Provider shall provide . . .
. . . New York Penal Law §§ 35.15(1),(2)(a). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2). . . .
. . . Lines 44 and 46 increased additional food and clothing expense from $34.55 to $35.15. . . .
. . . . § 35.15(a). . . . service provider retains the option of filing a motion to terminate its service - under 18 C.F.R. § 35.15 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a) (“[T]he actor may not use deadly physical force if he knows that he can with . . . force necessary to do so, and thereby place the defendant’s conduct outside the purview of Penal Law § 35.15 . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1), (2)(a). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . .
. . . . § 35.15, and Ala.Code § 22-8-1, without first granting them leave to amend pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. . . . AFFIRMED. . 42 C.F.R. § 35.15 requires that consent be obtained before performing a major operative procedure . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 35.15(2)(b); 35.15(2)(c); 35.20(3)). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(b); N.Y. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15[2][b]. The trial court precluded Dr. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15 for one statutory formulation of these complex rules, which very likely differs in . . .
. . . At the trial, DeJesus presented a defense, pursuant to New York Penal Law § 35.15(2), that his use of . . .
. . . . § 35.15 (McKinney 1975 & Supp.1987); Johnson v. Rosemeyer, 117 F.3d 104, 111 (3d Cir.1997). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a)(ii) (McKinney 1998). . . .
. . . Regarding the law of self-defense, New York Penal Law § 35.15(1) authorizes the use of physical force . . . Section 35.15(2)(b) authorizes the use of deadly physical force where “[h]e reasonably believes that . . . shooting Imagio because she reasonably feared that a second rape was imminent under New York Penal Law § 35.15 . . . Penal Law § 35.15). . . .
. . . . § 35.15(1). . . . Penal L. § 35.15(2). . . . Penal L. § 35.15(2)(b); see also N.Y. Penal L. § 160.00 (“Robbery is forcible stealing.”). . . . Pursuant to Penal Law § 35.15, a person ‘may’ use physical force to defend himself or a third person, . . . Almodovar, supra), there are no circumstances when justification (Penal Law § 35.15) can be a defense . . .
. . . Under section 35.15 of New York Penal Law, a person “may not use deadly physical force upon another person . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1) (McKinney 1998). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2). . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 35.05, 35.15 (McKinney 1997). . . . Penal Law § 35.15 states, A person may ... use physical force upon another person when and to the extent . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15; People v. . . .
. . . . §§ 35.15, 35.26-35.29). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a) (McKinney 1998). . . . Penal Law § 35.15 sets out the defense of justification for the use of force: 1. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a), In view of how close Bubblegum was to him, Davis could not have fled without . . .
. . . . § 35.15(a). . . . time at the discretion of the parties,” and, as such, did not have to be on file under 18 C.F.R. § 35.15 . . . The Commission’s Interpretation of its Regulation The Commission interpreted 18 C.F.R. § 35.15(a) as . . . In its Order on Rehearing, the Commission conceded that it “applied Section 35.15 to short-term power . . . In PCA’s view, the overruling of Portland General wrote the “part thereof’ language out of § 35.15(a) . . .
. . . . § 35.15 (1995) (repealed by Order 888). . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.15 (repealed by Order 888). . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.15 (1999). . . . a showing in the context of a utility’s proposed termination of a contract pursuant to the section 35.15 . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 35.15 provides that a person is justified in using physical force under the following . . . New York Penal Law § 35.15 (emphasis added). . . . See Penal Law § 35.15. (See also Report at 413). . . . The Justification Defense Under New York Law New York Penal Law § 35.15 provides that a person is justified . . . 639 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 663 N.E.2d 313 (1996), the New York Court of Appeals explained that Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 35.00, 35.15, requiring the defendant to show that he reasonably believed that his force . . . Penal Law § 35.15(1). . . .
. . . necessary to defend himself against the use of offensive physical force by his assailant. 1 CJI(N.Y) 35.15 . . .
. . . N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(1) (McKinney 1998). . . . Subdivision two of § 35.15 states, in part: A person may not use deadly physical force upon another person . . . (a) He reasonably believes that such other person is using or about to use deadly physical force. § 35.15 . . .
. . . the People failed to disprove his justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt (see, Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . . § 35.15 1(a), (b). . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(1)-(2) (McKinney 1987); see generally People v. . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a)(i) (McKinney 1987). . . .
. . . . § 35.15(2)(a)(use of deadly physical force justified only where actor reasonably believes other person . . .
. . . See N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(l)(b) (aggressor may not claim self-defense); United States v. . . .
. . . See N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). . . .
. . . The provisions relevant to this case are as follows: § 35.15 Justification; use of physical force in . . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . . According to the lower courts, because § 35.15 uses the term “he reasonably believes,” the appropriate . . . reasonably” in a statute, and misconstrues the clear intent of the Legislature, in enacting section 35.15 . . .
. . . Under N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a) a person is justified in using deadly force against another person . . . This alternative theory relies on N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(2)(b), under which a person may use deadly physical . . . N.Y.Penal Law, § 35.15(2)(b). . . .
. . . Penal Law, § 35.15(l)(b) McKinney (1988). . . .
. . . N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15. . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a). Retreat in “his dwelling” is not required. . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(2)(b). . . .
. . . Rhodes, 5 Orfield's Criminal Procedure Under the Federal Rules § 35.15, at 433-34 (2d ed. 1987). . . .
. . . to which he was pleading guilty, as justification is a complete defense to homicide, N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . 2,828 2,422 100.00% 85.64% 385 5 13.61% 0.18% 16 0 0.57% 0.00% GLEN OAKS SCHOOL 5,129 1,803 100.00% 35.15% . . .
. . . The plaintiff contends that the defendant Emanuele violated the provisions of New York’s Penal Law § 35.15 . . . The pertinent provisions of New York Penal Law are as follows: “§ 35.15 Justification; use of physical . . . Under such circumstances, the officer is under no duty to retreat (see id. at § 35.15[2][a][ii]). . . . enunciated a hybrid subjective/objective analysis with regard to a private person under Penal Law § 35.15 . . . was justified in causing the death of the decedent, under the provisions of the New York Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . Maiorino contends that Justice Torres’ refusal to instruct the jury pursuant to New York Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15. . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a) (McKinney 1987). . . . Magliato, 68 N.Y.2d 24, 30, 496 N.E.2d 856, 860, 505 N.Y.S.2d 836, 840 (1986) (Huntley held that § 35.15 . . . Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a) (McKinney 1987). . . . Penal Law § 35.15(l)(b) (McKinney 1987). . . . .
. . . MAI 35.15 illustration (3d ed. . . . Instruction number 13, see also MAI 35.15 illustration (3d ed. Supp.1989) (emphasis added). . . . MAI 37.03 as written in the MAI 35.15 illustration clearly and correctly instructs the jury on the same . . .
. . . Second, counsel failed to request an instruction on justification under New York Penal Law § 35.15(2) . . . reasonably believes “is committing or attempting to commit a ... robbery” under New York Penal Law § 35.15 . . . counsel requested and received a justification defense instruction pursuant to New York Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . As stated above, 35.15 hours ($3,078.00) would be disallowed under the common fund theory. . . .
. . . New York Penal Law § 35.15 provides that a police officer may use deadly force upon another person if . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(2)(a)(ii) (Consol.1984). . . .
. . . See N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15(1) (McKinney 1987) (use of physical force in defense of self or third person . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15 (McKinney 1975 & Supp.1986). . . .
. . . . §§ 35.00, 35.15 and Practice Commentaries by Arnold D. Hechtman to § 35.-00. . . .
. . . Miller, 39 N.Y.2d 543, 548, 384 N.Y.S.2d 741, 745, 349 N.E.2d 841, 845 (1976); see also N.Y.Penal Law § 35.15 . . .
. . . 14.71 33.60 38.12 29.54 34.82 25.64 15.65 18.87 34.55 22.50 20.70 30.12 21.58 17.50 36.31 40.31 26.75 35.15 . . .
. . . . § 35.15(c)(1) (emphasis supplied). . . .
. . . New York Penal Law §§ 35.10(6) and 35.15(2) further provide that a person may be justified in using physical . . .
. . . Penal Law § 35.15, and argued that since Washington was acting in defense of his wife and himself, his . . . Penal Law § 35.15, which imposes, upon the intended victim of a murder the duty to retreat, is unconstitutional . . .
. . . a reasonable doubt; (3) petitioner was not denied effective assistance of counsel, and (4) section 35.15 . . .