In re Julianne NN., 260 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Julianne NN., 260 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cabrera v. Two-Three-Nought-Four Associates
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
Co., 7 AD3d 900, 901 [2004], appeal dismissed and lv denied 3 NY3d 735 [2004]; Matter of Ayers v Hakes, 260 AD2d 975, 976 [1999]), we uphold the Board’s finding of noncoverage as supported by the documentary evidence and testimony credited by the Board.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Claim of Thomson v. Brute Spring & Equipment, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2005 · confidence medium
Co., 7 AD3d 900 [2004], appeal dismissed, lv denied 3 NY3d 735 [2004]; Matter of Ayers v Hakes, 260 AD2d 975, 976 [1999]; compare Matter of Daughtrey v Enertex Computer Concepts, 149 AD2d 872 [1989]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Claim of Cacciatore v. AJ Hunter Construction Co.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · confidence medium
Regardless, given that claimant’s operation of the backhoe was completely unrelated to the business of cabinet installation and sales, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that the claim was not covered (see Matter of Ayers v Hakes, 260 AD2d 975, 976 [1999]; compare Matter of Spazianto v Bruno, 7 AD2d 671 [1958], lv denied 5 NY2d 711 [1959]; Matter of Blenner v Joseph Landis, Inc., 277 App Div 489 [1950], lv denied 302 NY 947 [1950]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Julianne NN., a Person Alleged to be in Need of Supervision, Glenn Whittington, as Probation Officer of Broome County
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 29, 1999.
260 A.D.2d 975
Yesawich.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Yesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Pines, J.), entered June 3, 1998, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, finding respondent in violation of a prior disposition.

Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating her a person in need of supervision (hereinafter PINS) and placing her in the care of petitioner for a period of one year. Inasmuch as Family Court failed to specifically advise respondent of her right to remain silent, as required by Family Court Act § 741 (a), prior to accepting her admissions to the allegations contained in the PINS petition (see, Matter of Tyronda K., 209 AD2d 816; Matter of Anthony SS., 197 AD2d 767, 768), the order adjudicating her a PINS must be reversed and the order of disposition vacated.

Were we to reach respondent’s remaining argument, we would find it to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Broome County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.