People v. Halloway, 305 A.D.2d 117 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Halloway, 305 A.D.2d 117 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Nichols
N.Y. App. Div. · 2018 · confidence medium
People v Pham, 118 AD3d 1159 , 1160 [3d Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1087 [2014]; People v Perser, 67 AD3d 1048, 1050 [3d Dept 2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 941 [2010]; People v Wilmore, 305 AD2d 117, 118 [1st Dept 2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 589 [2003]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Davis
N.Y. App. Div. · 2015 · confidence medium
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. * Although not addressed by the parties, criminal contempt in the first degree is not a lesser included offense of aggravated criminal contempt in the first degree (see People v Hira, 100 AD3d 922 , 924 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 943 [2013]; People v Wilmore, 305 AD2d 117, 118 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 589 [2003]) and, therefore, County Court inaccurately characterized the offense as such in its charge to the jury.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Cung (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
A Burmese interpreter testified that, on the date the first order of protection was issued, he translated the order of protection from English to Burmese and explained it to defendant (see People v Wilmore, 305 AD2d 117, 118 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 589 [2003]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Cung (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
A Burmese interpreter testified that, on the date the first order of protection was issued, he translated the order of protection from English to Burmese and explained it to defendant (see People v Wilmore, 305 AD2d 117, 118 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 589 [2003]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Hira
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Although the defendant was convicted of aggravated criminal contempt, criminal contempt in the first degree is not a lesser-included offense of that crime (see CPL 1.20 [37]; People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 63-64 [1982]; People v Wilmore, 305 AD2d 117, 118 [2003]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Hira
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · confidence medium
Although the defendant was convicted of aggravated criminal contempt, criminal contempt in the first degree is not a lesser-included offense of that crime (see CPL 1.20 [37]; People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 63-64 [1982]; People v Wilmore, 305 AD2d 117, 118 [2003]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) People v. Clark
N.Y. App. Div. · 2008 · confidence medium
Had they been preserved, we would find them to be without merit (see Penal Law former § 215.52; People v Wilmore, 305 AD2d 117, 118 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 589 [2003]).
discussed Cited "see" CUNG, VAN T., PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
We thus conclude that “[t]he evidence is legally sufficient . . . to establish defendant’s knowledge of the existence and contents of [the first] order of protection [and] the conduct prohibited thereby” (People v Roman, 13 AD3d 1115, 1115 , lv denied 4 NY3d 802 ; see Wilmore, 305 AD2d at 118 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Ronnie Halloway
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 1, 2003.
305 A.D.2d 117
Published

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J.), rendered March 18, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, who received the minimum sentence permitted by law, requests this Court to reduce his conviction to a lesser offense so as to permit imposition of a more lenient sentence. We conclude that defendant’s comprehensive waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of such a claim (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.