People v. Dixon, 308 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Dixon, 308 A.D.2d 548 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Azaz
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · confidence medium
The defendant’s contention that the trial court’s instruction to a panel of prospective jurors, three of whom sat on the jury, violated his right against self-incrimination is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Autry, 75 NY2d 836, 839 [1990]; People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 340 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]; People v Field, 308 AD2d 548, 549 [2003]), and in any event, is without merit.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Janul Dixon, Also Known as Janul Dixson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Sep 22, 2003.
308 A.D.2d 548
Published

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), rendered July 1, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.