green
Positive treatment
19.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Smart Realty & Mgt. LLC v. Celona
An attorney's lack of familiarity with the legal system and basic rules of practice is insufficient to demonstrate such a reasonable excuse (see US Bank N.A. v. Brown, 147 A.D.3d 428,429 , 46 N.Y.S.3d 107 ; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 149 A.D.3d at 1552, 52 N.Y.S.3d 788 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Ahmed, 137 A.D.3d 1106, 1109 , 29 N.Y.S.3d 33 ; City of Utica v. Mallette, 200 A.D.3d 1614 , 159 N.Y.S.3d 288,291 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Pieri
"In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff has standing where, at the time the action is commenced, it is the holder or assignee of both the subject mortgage and the underlying note" ( NNPL Trust Series 2012-1 v Lunn , 149 AD3d 1552, 1553 [4th Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]). "[P]hysical delivery of the note prior to the commencement of the foreclosure action is sufficient to transfer the obligation, and the mortgage passes with the debt as an inseparable incident" ( id . at 1553-1554 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v Taylor , 25 NY3d 35…
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Liebel
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Here, plaintiff sufficiently pleaded in its complaint that it “is the current owner and holder of the aforesaid mortgage and note.” Moreover, plaintiff’s submissions in support of its motion establishied that the note and mortgage were assigned to the Trust in 2005 and have not been subsequently reassigned (see NNPL Trust Series 2012-1, 149 AD3d at 1554; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 140 AD3d at 1624 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Mercure
We agree with plaintiff that the court erred in determining that it failed to meet its burden on the motion of establishing standing to foreclose on the mortgage. " 'In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff has standing where, at the time the action is commenced, it is the holder or assignee of both the subject mortgage and the underlying note' " ( JPMorgan Chase Bank , N.A. v Kobee , 140 AD3d 1622, 1623-1624 [4th Dept 2016]; see NNPL Trust Series 2012-1 v Lunn , 149 AD3d 1552, 1553 [4th Dept 2017]), " 'either by physical delivery or execution of a written assignment prior to the co…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kondaur Capital Corporation, as Separate Trustee of Matawin Ventures Trust Series 2012-3
v.
Dianne L. Lunn
v.
Dianne L. Lunn
Appeal No. 1.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Apr 28, 2017.
Centra, Scudder, Smith, Troutman, Whalen.
Published
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered July 10, 2014 in a mortgage foreclosure action. The order, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.