green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
“the petitioner's pro se status or lack of counsel at previous habeas proceedings do not qualify as legitimate causes because these conditions are not external to his defense”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Webb v. Lumpkin
the petitioner's pro se status or lack of counsel at previous habeas proceedings do not qualify as legitimate causes because these conditions are not external to his defense
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Sertich, Jr.
See United States v. Smith, 3 F.3d 436 , 1993 WL 346875, *3-4 (5th Cir. 1993) (noting that defendant’s disregard for accountants’ warnings, inter alia, was evidence of willful intent to conceal).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Heptinstall
v.
Blount
v.
Blount
92-7481.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 11, 1993.
Heptinstall
v.
Blount[*]
NO. 92-7481
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Aug 11, 1993
1
Appeal From: S.D.Miss.
2
AFFIRMED IN PART.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2