United States v. Lawal, 5 F.3d 528 (5th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Lawal, 5 F.3d 528 (5th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“substantial economic harm is plainly the type of injury for which parties may seek redress in federal court.”
31 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Any and All Funds on Deposit in Account Number Xxxx1518 at HSBC Bank Plc. 55 Corporation Street, Coventry, United Kingdom, Held in the Name of Jittisopa Siriwan, and Any Property Traceable Thereto (dcd, 2015-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) United States v. Any and All Funds on Deposit in Account Number Xxxx1518 at HSBC Bank Plc. 55 Corporation Street, Coventry, United Kingdom, Held in the Name of Jittisopa Siriwan, and Any Property Traceable Thereto
D.D.C. · 2015 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
substantial economic harm is plainly the type of injury for which parties may seek redress in federal court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Lawal
92-2634.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 10, 1993.
5 F.3d 528
Published

5 F.3d 528

U.S.
v.
Lawal

NO. 92-2634

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept 10, 1993

1

Appeal From: S.D.Tex.

2

AFFIRMED.