Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
CHAD CROWTHER v. JOEL ASADOORIAN & Another.
The doctrine is based on the premise that a party who has negligently or intentionally lost or destroyed evidence known to be relevant for an upcoming legal proceeding should be held accountable for any unfair prejudice that results." Keene, 439 11 Mass. at 234, citing Fletcher v. Dorchester Mut.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hollibut Herrick versus Andrew Richardson
Rice and Warren, for the defendant., Boutell, for the plaintiff.
Published
Per Curiam.
The return of the officer is not non est inventus; nor sufficient to charge the bail. Let the plaintiff be called, (a)
Plaintiff nonsuit.
[*219] CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, IN THE COUNTY OF LINCOLN, JUNE TERM, 1814, AT WISCASSET. PRESENT: Hon. SAMUEL SEW ALL, Chief Justice. Hon. GEORGE THATCHER,) Hon. ISAAC PARKER, > Justices Hon. DANIEL DEWEY, )
Vide Sayward & Al. vs. Conant, ante, 146, and note.