Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Reed (C. A., Jr.), Barham (Charles C.) v. Fed. Ins. Co., 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Reed (C. A., Jr.), Barham (Charles C.) v. Fed. Ins. Co., 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (U.S.) v. Fairley (mssd, 2007-04-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (U.S.) v. Fairley
S.D. Miss. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Asociacion Nacional de Pescadores v. Dow Quimica, 988 F.2d 559, 565 (5th Cir. 1993) (hereinafter “ANPAC”), reh’g denied, 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1041 , 114 S.Ct. 685 , 126 L.Ed.2d 653 (1994), abrogated on other grounds by Marathon Oil Co. v. Ruhrgas, 145 F.3d 211 (5th Cir.1998); De Aguilar v. Boeing Co., 47 F.3d 1404, 1411-12 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 865 , 116 S.Ct. 180 , 133 L.Ed.2d 119 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" NIKKI LEADER v. SCHOOL BOARD OF THE PARISH OF LIVINGSTON, LOUISIANA; J. ROGERS POPE; AND J. LLOYD WAX
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See McGinnis v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 548 , 550 n.1 (5th Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994) (noting that Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associated Limited Partnership, 507 U.S. 380 , 113 S.Ct. 1489 , 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993), did not change the standard of good cause under FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barnett Bank of Broward County v. Tussing (In re Tussing)
Bankr. N.D. Ohio · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Kirkland, 86 F.3d at 176 ; see also McGinnis v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 548, 550 (5th Cir.1993) (stating that inadvertanee, mistake, or neglect of counsel do not constitute “good cause”), rehearing denied, 5 F.3d 530 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , 114 S.Ct. 1293 , 127 L.Ed.2d 647 (1994); Braxton v. United States, 817 F.2d 238, 241-42 (3rd Cir.1987) (stating that neither inadvertence of counsel nor half-hearted attempts at service amount to “good cause” under former Rule 4(j) in holding that the “unexplained delinquency on the part of the process server and lack of oversight by…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
v.
Reed (C. A., Jr.), Barham (Charles C.) v. Federal Insurance Company
92-4235.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 13, 1993.
5 F.3d 530
Published

5 F.3d 530

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
v.
Reed (C. A., Jr.), Barham (Charles C.) v. Federal Insurance Company

NO. 92-4235

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept 13, 1993

W.D.La., 995 F.2d 600

1

DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.