United States v. Stanley Pickens, 7 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Stanley Pickens, 7 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Piner v. Hemingway (ca6, 2002-11-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Piner v. Hemingway
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Piner, No. 93-1047, 1993 WL 384921 , 7 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. September 29, 1993) (unpublished opinion).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Stanley Pickens
92-2306.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Sep 7, 1993.
7 F.3d 236
Unpublished

7 F.3d 236

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stanley PICKENS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-2306.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1993.

Before KEITH, GUY and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.