United States v. John L. Tincher (92-3796) William K. Tincher (92-3797) James Acord (92-3798), 8 F.3d 350 (6th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. John L. Tincher (92-3796) William K. Tincher (92-3797) James Acord (92-3798), 8 F.3d 350 (6th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Philpott (ohsb, 2014-03-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Philpott
Bankr. S.D. Ohio · 2014 · confidence medium
Since the automatic stay does not bar suits against codefendants in litigation pending in other courts, the state law and FLSA claims against the codefendants named in the parallel district court litigation may proceed without further delay. 5 See Patton v. Bearden, 8 F.3d at 350.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
John L. Tincher (92-3796) William K. Tincher (92-3797) James Acord (92-3798)
92-3796.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 22, 1993.
8 F.3d 350
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

8 F.3d 350w

62 USLW 2286

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John L. TINCHER (92-3796); William K. Tincher (92-3797);
James Acord (92-3798), Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 92-3796 to 92-3798.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Argued April 27, 1993.
Decided Oct. 22, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION