Edward A. Ganey, Jr., & Herbert Dale Hudson v. Martin J. McDade Odis T. Temple John Doe Lockamy, 8 F.3d 817 (4th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Edward A. Ganey, Jr., & Herbert Dale Hudson v. Martin J. McDade Odis T. Temple John Doe Lockamy, 8 F.3d 817 (4th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Keen, Inc. v. Gecker (ilnd, 2003-05-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Keen, Inc. v. Gecker
N.D. Ill. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chesapeake Fiber Packaging Corp. v. Sebro Packaging Corp., 143 B.R. 360 , (D.Md.1992), aff'd 8 F.3d 817 , 1993 WL 441806 (4th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward A. Ganey, Jr., and Herbert Dale Hudson
v.
Martin J. McDade Odis T. Temple John Doe Lockamy
93-6767.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 28, 1993.
8 F.3d 817
Unpublished

8 F.3d 817

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward A. GANEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Herbert Dale Hudson, Plaintiff,
v.
Martin J. MCDADE; Odis T. Temple; John Doe Lockamy,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6767.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 27, 1993.
Decided: October 28, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Edward A. Ganey, Jr, Appellant Pro Se.

Neil Clark Dalton, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Motion to Remand. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ganey v. McDade, No. CA-93-317 (E.D.N.C. June 22, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED