Heen v. Harris, 9 F.3d 114 (8th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Heen v. Harris, 9 F.3d 114 (8th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bell v. North Dakota University System (mnd, 2023-02-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bell v. North Dakota University System
D. Minnesota · 2023 · confidence medium
The Eleventh Amendment “is a specific constitutional bar against hearing even federal claims that otherwise would be within the jurisdiction of the federal courts.” Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 120 (1984) (emphasis in original) (citations omitted); Kula v. State of Neb., 9 F.3d 114, at *1 (8th Cir. 1993) (unpublished table decision) (holding that sovereign immunity barred plaintiff’s § 1983 claims against state) (citing Pennhurst, 465 U.S. at 99 - 100).
discussed Cited "see" Rodgers v. Montgomery
E.D. Mo. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dyer v. Farley, 9 F.3d 114 (8th Cir. 1993) (discussing a thyroid condition as a serious medical need in the context of a deliberate indifference claim).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joyce F. Heen John H. Heen
v.
Gary Harris Arabian Associates, Doing Business as Celebration Farm and Training Center, Ltd. Robert Boggs Midwest Training Center
92-3751.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Nov 17, 1993.
9 F.3d 114
Unpublished

9 F.3d 114

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Joyce F. HEEN; John H. Heen, Appellants,
v.
Gary HARRIS; Arabian Associates, doing business as
Celebration Farm and Training Center, LTD.; Robert
Boggs; Midwest Training Center, Appellees.

No. 92-3751NE.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 10, 1993.
Filed: November 17, 1993.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and VIETOR,[*] District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

We ordered this appeal submitted on the parties' briefs. Having considered the record and the parties' arguments, we conclude the district court committed no error. We also conclude an opinion would have no precedential value. We agree with the district court that the parties made a binding settlement agreement, and the Heens' underlying claims were released in that agreement. We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to conduct an in camera review of privileged documents. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

The HONORABLE HAROLD D. VIETOR, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation