United States v. Isasc (Michael D.), 9 F.3d 122 (11th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Isasc (Michael D.), 9 F.3d 122 (11th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: M.H. & E.K. o/b/o P.H. M.S. & L.S. o/b/o of D.S. v. NYC Dep’t of (ca2, 2012-06-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) M.H. & E.K. o/b/o P.H. M.S. & L.S. o/b/o of D.S. v. NYC Dep’t of
2d Cir. · 2012 · confidence medium
Under an IEP, 7 "education [must] be provided in the 'least restrictive setting 8 consistent with a child's needs.'" Id. (quoting Walczak, 142 9 F.3d at 122 (2d Cir. 1998)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Isasc (Michael D.)
91-4120.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Nov 4, 1993.
9 F.3d 122
Published

9 F.3d 122

U.S.
v.
Isasc (Michael D.)

NO. 91-4120

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Nov 04, 1993

M.D.Fla., 2

F.3d 404

1

DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.