Springfield Pres. Trust, Inc. v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield, 387 N.E.2d 211 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Springfield Pres. Trust, Inc. v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield, 387 N.E.2d 211 (Mass. App. Ct. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Belezos v. Board of Selectmen of Hingham, Massachusetts (mad, 2019-11-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Belezos v. Board of Selectmen of Hingham, Massachusetts (2×)
D. Mass. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Id.; see In re Sonus Networks, Inc., 499 F.3d 47, 59 (1st Cir. 2007) (“Sonus Networks”) (quoting above language in Springfield Springfield Preservation Trust, Inc. v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield, 7 Mass.App.Ct. 895 , 387 N.E.2d 211 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Springfield Preservation Trust, Inc. & another
v.
Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield & others
Massachusetts Appeals Court.
Apr 3, 1979.
387 N.E.2d 211
John J. Egan for the Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield & another., Harry P. Carroll for Charles Cook, Jr., Michael G. West, for the plaintiffs, submitted a brief., Thomas J. Reed, Bradford R. Carver, Richard Johnson, Robert Masse & Linda Mitchell, for the Society for the Conservation of the, Architectural and Natural Environment, Inc., amicus curiae, submitted a brief.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing under Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b), 365 Mass. 755 (1974), their complaint for injunctive relief and for a declaration that a portion of § 27-2 of the Revised Ordinances of the City of Springfield, effective September 12, 1972, establishing the Quadrangle-Mattoon Street Historic District is invalid and unconstitutional. The claim for injunctive relief has been disposed of in prior proceedings, and only the claim for declaratory relief remains. The complaint was properly dismissed.

Chapter 231A, § 8, of the General Laws, as amended by St. 1974, c. 630, § 4, requires that in any proceeding "which involves the validity of a municipal ordinance ... the municipality shall be made a party.” The city of Springfield is, therefore, a necessary party, and a declaratory judgment cannot be entered in its absence. Morgan v. Banas, 331 Mass. 694, 698 (1954). Although the building commissioner of Springfield was made a party he is not the city, cf. Mayor of Cambridge v. Dean, 300 Mass. 174, 176 (1938), and does not represent its interest for purposes of c. 231A, § 8. Compare Building Inspector of Wayland v. Ellen M. Gifford Sheltering Home Corp., 344 Mass. 281, 286-287 (1962).

In addition, there is no indication in the record that the Attorney General was sent notice and given the opportunity to be heard as is required by c. 231 A, § 8, if "a question of constitutionality” is raised. "Such notice and opportunity are conditions precedent to the entry of a declaratory decree.” Court St. Parking Co. v. Boston, 336 Mass. 224, 226 (1957). See also Lowell v. Boston, 322 Mass. 709, 740-741 (1948).

Since the plaintiffs have not complied with c. 231A, § 8, we do not reach the other questions raised by the parties and the amicus curiae.

Judgment affirmed.

Architectural and Natural Environment, Inc., amicus curiae, submitted a brief.