green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“a pro se litigant must be given leave to amend his or her 13 complaint, and some notice of its deficiencies, unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of 14 the complaint could not be cured by amendment.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
(PC) Cox v. Krpin
a pro se litigant must be given leave to amend his or her 13 complaint, and some notice of its deficiencies, unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of 14 the complaint could not be cured by amendment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Isaiah Hartford Herndon v. City of Reno, Casey Thomas, and Steven Welin
See Cato v. United States, 70 12 F.3d 1103 , 1106 (9th Cir. 1995). 13 Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for dismissal of a 14 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
cited
Cited "see"
Ligon v. Gittere
See Cato v. United States, 70 12 F.3d 1103 , 1106 (9th Cir. 1995). 13 Review under Rule 12(b)(6) is essentially a ruling on a question of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Mary Place
See Cato v. United States, 70 12 F.3d 1103 , 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995) (IFP compliant that repeats pending claims is abusive and 13 properly dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)); Aziz v. Burrows, 976 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1992) 14 (“district courts may dismiss a duplicative complaint raising issues directly related to issues in 15 another pending action brought by the same party”); Adams v. California Dept. of Health 16 Services, 487 F.3d 684 , 688 (9th Cir. 2007) (“Plaintiffs generally have ‘no right to maintain two 17 separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mickie James Meriwether
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-2615.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Dec 8, 1993.
Unpublished
Citer courts: E.D. California (1)
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Mickie James MERIWETHER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee.
No. 93-2615EM.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: November 30, 1993.
Filed: December 8, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
Based on the record before us, we find no error that would require reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.