Henry Anderson v. Wes Gebb Env't Health Dep't Valentina Reiner, 12 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Henry Anderson v. Wes Gebb Env't Health Dep't Valentina Reiner, 12 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the mere existence of the claims , however, is not evidence of a pattern or practice condoned by the city.”
30 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jurgens v. Columbia County (ord, 2025-02-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Jurgens v. Columbia County
D. Or. · 2025 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the mere existence of the claims , however, is not evidence of a pattern or practice condoned by the city.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) St Peter v. Franklin County
E.D. Wash. · 2023 · confidence medium
Alexander v. Jeffries, 12 F.3d 1105 11 (9th Cir. 1993) (citing Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir. 1987)). 12 Plaintiff moves to amend his complaint more than 11 months after filing his 13 complaint, more than nine months after Defendants filed their answer, and more 14 than five months after Defendants moved for summary judgment.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) King-McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
D. Ariz. · 2020 · confidence medium
“This requirement will 8 not be satisfied if ‘the record raises crucial questions as to the extent of [a claimant’s] 9 impairment given inconsistencies between his testimony and the medical evidence in the 10 record,’ because ‘[t]hese are exactly the sort of issues that should be remanded to the 11 agency for further proceedings.’” Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495 (quoting Treichler, 775 12 F.3d at 1105). 13 Here, the Court finds remand for further administrative proceedings is appropriate. 14 The ALJ erred by failing to address Dr. Hassman’s opinion that Plaintiff needed to chang…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry Anderson
v.
Wes Gebb Environmental Health Department Valentina Reiner
93-15527.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 15, 1993.
12 F.3d 1105
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: D. Oregon (1)

12 F.3d 1105

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Henry ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wes GEBB; Environmental Health Department; Valentina
Reiner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-15527.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 1993.[*]
Decided Dec. 15, 1993.

Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM[**]

2

Henry Anderson appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint. The court also imposed a $618.45 Rule 11 sanction, declared Anderson a vexatious litigant and prohibited him from making any future related filings without permission from the chief judge. We affirm.

3

Because Anderson's perjury and fraud claims were or could have been raised in earlier actions, his claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Federated Department Stores v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 398 (1981). Also, his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claims are barred by the statute of limitations. His claims arising from the 1982 inspection expired by 1986, and any perjury claim was stale by January 14, 1990. See Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556, 561 (9th Cir.1987).

4

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3