United States v. Roberto Cisneros-Garcia, United States of Am. v. Rodney Arnett Cohee, 14 F.3d 41 (10th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Roberto Cisneros-Garcia, United States of Am. v. Rodney Arnett Cohee, 14 F.3d 41 (10th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Woods (ca7, 2003-08-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Woods
7th Cir. · 2003 · confidence medium
United States v. Ruiz, 180 F.3d 675, 676 (5th Cir.1999); United States v. McCullough, 53 F.3d 164, 165 (6th Cir.1995); United States v. Cisneros-Garcia, 14 F.3d 41, 42 (10th Cir.1994); United States v. Sarno, 24 F.3d 618, 624 (4th Cir.1994); United States v. Tapia, 981 F.2d 1194, 1197-98 (11th Cir.1993); United States v. McGann, 960 F.2d 846, 847 (9th Cir.1992).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Denton
6th Cir. · 2002 · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Stalbaum, 63 F.3d 537, 540 (7th Cir.1995); United States v. Cisneros-Garcia, 14 F.3d 41, 42 (10th Cir.1994); United States v. Hillstrom, 988 F.2d 448 (3d Cir.1993) (remanded for consideration of whether a non-secure federal prison camp was similar to a community corrections center), on remand, 837 F.Supp. 1324 (M.D.Pa.1993) (facility found not to be similar), aff'd without opinion, 37 F.3d 1490 (3d Cir.1994); United States v. Tapia, 981 F.2d 1194, 1198 (11th Cir.1993); United States v. Shaw, 979 F.2d 41, 45 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. McGann, 960 F.2d 846, 847 …
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Stanley Bobby Daniels
4th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
See United States v. Sarno, 24 F.3d 618, 623, n. 4 (4th Cir.1994); see also United States v. Stalbaum, 63 F.3d 537, 540 (7th Cir.1995); United States v. McCullough, 53 F.3d 164, 164-65 (6th Cir.1995); United States v. Cisneros-Garcia, 14 F.3d 41, 42 (10th Cir.1994); United States v. Tapia, 981 F.2d 1194, 1197-98 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993); United States v. Shaw, 979 F.2d 41, 45 (5th Cir.1992). 3 The sentence is affirmed.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Daniels
4th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
See United States v. Sarno, 24 F.3d 618, 623, n.4 (4th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Stalbaum, 63 F.3d 537, 540 (7th Cir. 1995); United States v. McCullough, 53 F.3d 164, 164-65 (6th Cir. 1995); United States v. Cisneros-Garcia, 14 F.3d 41, 42 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Tapia, 981 F.2d 1194, 1197-98 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993); United States v. Shaw, 979 F.2d 41, 45 (5th Cir. 1992).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sergio Mendiola
5th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Cisneros-Garcia, 14 F.3d 41 (10th Cir.1994); United States v. Weaver, 920 F.2d 1570 (11th Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mendiola
5th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Cisneros-Garcia, 14 F.3d 41 (10th Cir. 1994); United States v. Weaver, 920 F.2d 1570 (11th Cir. 1991). - 8 -
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mark Paul Sarno
4th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Cisneros-Garcia, 14 F.3d 41 (10th Cir.1994) (holding that Leavenworth Federal Prison Camp was non-secure, but was not similar to community correctional centers); United States v. Hillstrom, 988 F.2d 448 (3d Cir. 1993) (where defendant escaped from work detail outside Allenwood Federal Prison Camp which parties did not dispute was non-secure, the court held that the first prong was met, but remanded for further consideration, under the second prong of the test, the purpose, security policies, and safety ramifications of Allenwood as compared to community corrections …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roberto CISNEROS-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Arnett COHEE, Defendant-Appellant
93-3216, 93-3217.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Jan 19, 1994.
14 F.3d 41
Submitted on the Briefs: *, Charles D. Anderson, Federal Public Defender, and Charles D. Dedmon, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Topeka, KS, for defendant-appellant Roberto Cisneros-Garcia and defendant-appellant Rodney Arnett Cohee., Randall K. Rathbun, U.S. Atty., and Thomas G. Luedke, Asst. U.S. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Moore, Anderson, Kelly.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Mr. Cisneros-Garcia and Mr. Cohee each pled guilty to escape from the U.S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Honor Camp. 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). Each was sentenced to an additional eighteen months. The district court declined to treat the escape as one from non-secure custody in a facility like “a community corrections center, community treatment center or ‘halfway house,’” and therefore declined to reduce the base offense level by four levels, U.S.S.G. § 2Pl.l(b)(3). The district court also rejected the argument that a two-level downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 was appropriate because, even if the Honor Camp was unlike the other facilities mentioned in U.S.S.G. § 2P1.1(b)(3), it met half the requirements of the pertinent guideline, i.e. non-secure custody. Mr. Cisneros-Garcia and Mr. Cohee urge the same grounds on appeal. Our jurisdiction arises under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and we affirm.

Under the Guidelines, we review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and its application of law de novo. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e). As below, the Defendants contend that factual development concerning the programs at the Leavenworth prison camp is needed to determine whether it is similar to a community corrections center or halfway house. See United States v. Hillstrom, 988 F.2d 448, 451-52 (3rd Cir.1993). For good reason, district courts in this circuit are not required to engage in this exercise. See United States v. Hillstrom, 837 F.Supp. 1324 (M.D.Pa.1993). The district court properly followed our decision in United- States v. [*42] Brownlee, 970 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.1992). We decline to read the “prison” out of “prison camp,” and reaffirm Brownlee.

We agree with the Ninth Circuit that the Sentencing Commission apparently viewed escape from prison facilities as more serious than escape from community-based programs. See United States v. Latimer, 991 F.2d 1509, 1512-13 (9th Cir.1993). The Sentencing Commission expressly considered escape from non-secure custody, but chose to grant any applicable reduction in base offense level upon prompt return, § 2Pl.l(b)(2), or upon a showing that the escape was from a community-based facility, § 2Pl.l(b)(3). Given such consideration, the departure urged under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) and U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0 was not available. Accordingly, the judgments are

AFFIRMED. The mandates shall issue forthwith.