Washington v. Whitley, 14 F.3d 52 (5th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Washington v. Whitley, 14 F.3d 52 (5th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the parole board may, as it did in this case, place a parole violator warrant on a prisoner as a detainer then wait to execute the warrant until the prisoner has completed his sentence for any crimes he committed while on parole.”
49 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pete Villegas v. Rick Thaler, Director (ca5, 2011-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Pete Villegas v. Rick Thaler, Director
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the parole board may, as it did in this case, place a parole violator warrant on a prisoner as a detainer then wait to execute the warrant until the prisoner has completed his sentence for any crimes he committed while on parole.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Larry James Porter v. Yang, et al.
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ghazali v. Moran, 46 14 F.3d 52 , 53–54 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal for noncompliance with local rule); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 15 963 F.2d 1258 , 1260–61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order requiring 16 amendment of complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128 , 130–33 (9th Cir. 1987) 17 (dismissal for failure to comply with court order). 18 In determining whether to dismiss an action, the Court must consider several factors: 19 (1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the Court’s need to manage its 20 docket; (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." (PC) Villery v. California Department of Corrections
E.D. Cal. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ghazali v. Moran, 46 14 F.3d 52 , 53–54 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal for noncompliance with local rule); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 15 963 F.2d 1258 , 1260–61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order requiring 16 amendment of complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128 , 130–33 (9th Cir. 1987) 17 (dismissal for failure to comply with court order). 18 In determining whether to dismiss an action, the Court must consider several factors: 19 (1) the public’s interest in expeditions resolution of litigation; (2) the Court’s need to manage its 20 docket; (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." (PC) Gaeta v. Sherman
E.D. Cal. · 2021 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ghazali v. Moran, 46 14 F.3d 52 , 53–54 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal for noncompliance with local rule); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 15 963 F.2d 1258 , 1260–61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order requiring 16 amendment of complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128 , 130–33 (9th Cir. 1987) 17 (dismissal for failure to comply with court order). 18 In determining whether to dismiss an action, the Court must consider several factors: 19 (1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the Court’s need to manage its 20 docket; (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." (PC) Clark v. Eaton
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ghazali v. Moran, 46 14 F.3d 52 , 53–54 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal for noncompliance with local rule); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 15 963 F.2d 1258 , 1260–61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order requiring 16 amendment of complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128 , 130–33 (9th Cir. 1987) 17 (dismissal for failure to comply with court order). 18 In determining whether to dismiss an action, the Court must consider several factors: 19 (1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the Court’s need to manage its 20 docket; (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." (PC) Winters v. Sherman
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ghazali v. Moran, 46 14 F.3d 52 , 53–54 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal for noncompliance with local rule); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 15 963 F.2d 1258 , 1260–61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order requiring 16 amendment of complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128 , 130–33 (9th Cir. 1987) 17 (dismissal for failure to comply with court order). 18 In determining whether to dismiss an action, the Court must consider several factors: 19 (1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the Court’s need to manage its 20 docket; (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." (PC) Barnes v. Brunner
E.D. Cal. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
“In determining whether to dismiss a case for failure to comply with a 9 court order the district court must weigh five factors including: ‘(1) the public's interest in 10 expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of 11 prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits; 12 and (5) the availability of less drastic alternatives.’” Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61 (quoting 13 Thompson v. Housing Auth., 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986)); see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 14 F.3d 52 , 53 (9th Cir. 199…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Washington
v.
Whitley
92-03939.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 29, 1993.
14 F.3d 52
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

14 F.3d 52

Washington
v.
Whitley[*]

NO. 92-03939

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec 29, 1993

1

Appeal From: M.D.La.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2