Cofap Trading S.A. v. Ende, 14 F.3d 592 (2d Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Cofap Trading S.A. v. Ende, 14 F.3d 592 (2d Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Manliguez v. Joseph (nyed, 2002-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Manliguez v. Joseph
E.D.N.Y · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blankman v. County of Nassau, 819 F.Supp. 198, 206 (E.D.N.Y.1993), aff'd 14 F.3d 592 (2d Cir.1993) (extending Owens to § 1985 claims); Daniel v. Safir, 175 F.Supp.2d 474, 479 (E.D.N.Y.2001) (recognizing that New York’s three-year limitations period governs §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, and 1985 claims).
discussed Cited "see" DeVito v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream
E.D.N.Y · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Blankman v. County of Nassau, 819 F.Supp. 198, 208 (E.D.N.Y.) (“[A] Plaintiff[ ] has an obligation to use reasonable diligence in ascertaining that he has a claim.”), aff'd, 14 F.3d 592 (2d Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Norbert Rivera v. United States
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rivera, 14 F.3d 592 (2d Cir.1993) (table).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." (PC) Eastman v. Tuolumne County Jail
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 , 535 n.16 4 (1979) (noting that “the Due Process Clause rather than the Eighth Amendment” is relied on in 5 considering claims of pretrial detainees because “Eighth Amendment scrutiny is appropriate only 6 after the State has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated with 7 criminal prosecutions”); Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 135 S. Ct. 2466, 2473 (2015) (“We have said 8 that the Due Process Clause protects a pretrial detainee from the use of excessive force that 9 amounts to punishment.” (internal quotation marks omitted))…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tyrone Jones v. Corrections Captain Hoffman
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Subsequent cases, however, have underscored the non-precedential nature of that statement by concluding that “[t]his Circuit has not yet ruled on this issue.” Rice v. Hoke, 846 F.2d 160, 164 (2d Cir.1988); see Knapp v. Leonardo, 46 F.3d 170, 179 (2d Cir.) (“Neither the Supreme Court nor this circuit has decided whether the failure to instruct a jury on lesser included offenses in noncapital cases is a constitutional issue that may be considered on a habeas petition.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S. Ct. 2566 , 132 L.Ed.2d 818 (1995); see also Jones v. Speckard, 827 F.Supp. 139, 146 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cofap Trading S.A.
v.
Ende
93-7734.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 24, 1993.
14 F.3d 592
Published

14 F.3d 592

Cofap Trading S.A.
v.
Ende

NO. 93-7734

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Nov 24, 1993

1

Appeal From: E.D.N.Y.

2

AFFIRMED.