green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases ·
…this court may affirm a decision of the district court on any ground supported by the record.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Well-Come Holdings, LLC v. American Safety Risk Retention Group, Inc.
this court may affirm a decision of the district court on any ground supported by the record.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Well-Come Holdings, LLC v. American Safety Risk Retention Group, Inc.
(2×)
this court may affirm a decision of the district court on any ground supported by the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
Senger Bros. Nursery, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.
(2×)
See Doe v. Cutter Biological, 813 F.Supp. 1547 (M.D.Fla.1993) aff'd 16 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James D. Nelson, Jr. v. American National Red Cross, James D. Nelson, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. American National Red Cross
(2×)
See, e.g., Doe v. Cutter Biological, 813 F.Supp. 1547, 1555 (M.D.Fla.1993), aff'd, 16 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir.1994); DiMarco v. Hudson Valley Blood Servs., 147 A.D.2d 156 , 542 N.Y.S.2d 521, 524-25 (1989); Doe v. University Hosp., 148 Misc.2d 756 , 561 N.Y.S.2d 326, 328 (Sup.Ct.1990); In re Complex Blood Bank Litig., No. 908-843 (Cal.Super.Ct.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Castro
v.
Castro
92-5116.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 16, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
U.S.
v.
Castro[*]
NO. 92-5116
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 16, 1994
1
Appeal From: S.D.Fla.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3