Paul M. Deloatch v. North Carolina Attorney Gen. Steve Boyles, 19 F.3d 10 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Paul M. Deloatch v. North Carolina Attorney Gen. Steve Boyles, 19 F.3d 10 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shipley v. Disney, Jr. (mdd, 2024-10-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Shipley v. Disney, Jr.
D. Maryland · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bailey v. Town of Smithfield, Va., 19 F.3d 10 (4th Cir. 1994) (single positive identification from photo array was sufficient to establish probable cause); Torchinsky v. Siwinski, 942 F.2d 257, 262 (4th Cir. 1991) (“It is surely reasonable for a police officer to base his belief in probable cause on a victim’s reliable identification of his attacker.”).
discussed Cited "see" Washington v. Baltimore Police Department
D. Maryland · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bailey v. Town of Smithfield, Va., 19 F.3d 10 , at *3, *6 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished decision) (finding that a single positive identification of the defendant as the robber from a photo array sufficed to establish probable cause); Torchinsky v. Siwinski, 942 F.2d 257, 262 (4th Cir. 1991) (reasoning that “[i]t is surely reasonable for a police officer to base his belief in probable cause on a victim’s reliable identification of his attacker,” as “it is difficult to imagine how a police officer could obtain better evidence of probable cause than an identification by name of assailan…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul M. Deloatch
v.
North Carolina Attorney General Steve Boyles
93-7171.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 8, 1994.
19 F.3d 10
Unpublished

19 F.3d 10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Paul M. DELOATCH, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; Steve Boyles, Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-7171.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided: March 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro; William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-93-53-2)

Paul M. Deloatch, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Deloatch v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-93-53-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED