Robert McComas Soc. Sec. No. Pgt-Rv-Kaja v. Donna E. Shalala, Sec'y of the Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 19 F.3d 23 (8th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Robert McComas Soc. Sec. No. Pgt-Rv-Kaja v. Donna E. Shalala, Sec'y of the Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 19 F.3d 23 (8th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Davidson v. Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare Plan (iasd, 2004-02-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Davidson v. Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare Plan
S.D. Iowa · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirkou v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Memphis, 19 F.3d 23 , 1994 WL 62807, *1 (8th Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hilsley v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
S.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence medium
The Ninth Circuit allows the award of fees to objectors only if the 20 objectors either increase the amount in the common fund or “otherwise substantially 21 benefit the class members.” Id. (quoting Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043 , 22 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2002)); see also Class Plaintiffs v. Jaffe & Schlesinger, P.A., 19 F.3d 23 1306, 1308-09 (9th Cir. 1994) (affirming denial of attorneys’ fees out of MDL settlement 24 fund to counsel who was engaged in parallel litigation in state court that was resolved by 25 the MDL settlement because even though counsels’ effort may have i…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert McComas Social Security No. Pgt-Rv-Kaja
v.
Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
93-3298.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Mar 22, 1994.
19 F.3d 23
Unpublished

19 F.3d 23

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Robert MCCOMAS, Social Security No. inv-ty-xlte Appellant,
v.
Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services, Appellee.

No. 93-3298.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 16, 1994.
Filed: March 22, 1994.

Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Robert McComas appeals the judgment of the District Court affirming the final decision of the Secretary denying McComas's claim for Disability Insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income based on disability. For reversal, McComas argues that (1) the Secretary's decision is not supported by substantial evidence, and (2) his evidence of disabling pain was not considered under the appropriate legal standards.

2

Having considered the briefs of the parties and the record in this case, we conclude that McComas's arguments lack merit. We are satisfied that no error of law appears and that the Secretary's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Finally, we conclude that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.