United States v. Richardson, 20 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
United States v. Richardson, 20 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the district court's order striking and unfiling the document was improper. the notice of appeal is effective to confer appellate jurisdiction.”
44 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Innovative Communication Corp. (vid, 2008-12-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re Innovative Communication Corp.
D.V.I. · 2008 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the district court's order striking and unfiling the document was improper. the notice of appeal is effective to confer appellate jurisdiction.
discussed Cited "see" Minor Child v. Roman Cath Ch
5th Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Sullivan, 20 F.3d 468 , 1994 WL 122169 , at *2 (5th Cir. Mar. 25, 1994). 8 Case: 23-30565 Document: 79-1 Page: 9 Date Filed: 07/17/2024 No. 23-30565 In any case, the district court’s comprehensive analysis of its jurisdiction, resulting in its well-reasoned footnote approving an interlocutory appeal, was more than sufficient to comply with the requirements of Section 158, Rule 8004, and Delta Produce.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Richardson
93-07520.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 25, 1994.
20 F.3d 468

20 F.3d 468

U.S.
v.
Richardson[**]

NO. 93-07520

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Mar 25, 1994

1

Appeal From: S.D.Miss.

2

AFFIRMED.

**

Conference Calendar