Ronald Graham v. Sylvia Whitten, Irene Dunn Hayes, Dietician Tabelina, Dietician Harris, Dietician Chuck Thompson George Hinkle Erving, Couns., 21 F.3d 422 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Ronald Graham v. Sylvia Whitten, Irene Dunn Hayes, Dietician Tabelina, Dietician Harris, Dietician Chuck Thompson George Hinkle Erving, Couns., 21 F.3d 422 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 265× by 265 distinct cases, 2019–2023 · …render an action brought in state court removable. ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
301 citation events (267 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marqus Stevenson v. City of Seat Pleasant, MD
4th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jackson v. Consolidation Coal Co., 21 F.3d 422 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished table decision); see also Barwick v. Celotex Corp., 736 F.2d 946, 960 (4th Cir.1984). (“If a party who has been examined at length on deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ronald Graham
v.
Sylvia Whitten, Irene Dunn Hayes, Dietician Tabelina, Dietician Harris, Dietician Chuck Thompson George Hinkle Erving, Counselor
94-6093.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 6, 1994.
21 F.3d 422
Published

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ronald GRAHAM, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sylvia WHITTEN, Irene Dunn; Hayes, Dietician; Tabelina,
Dietician; Harris, Dietician; Chuck Thompson;
George Hinkle; Erving, Counselor,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-426)

Ronald Graham, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED