Valerie Stringer-Earnest v. Dep't of the Navy, 22 F.3d 1107 (Fed. Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Valerie Stringer-Earnest v. Dep't of the Navy, 22 F.3d 1107 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Arash Ghayoori v. Cobra Trading, Inc. (wawd, 2025-12-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Arash Ghayoori v. Cobra Trading, Inc.
W.D. Wash. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
Wash. Apr. 10, 2014); see United States v. Carter, 560 22 F.3d 1107 , 1113 (9th Cir. 2009) (a “district court’s denial of counsel’s motion to 1 withdraw is reviewed for an abuse of discretion”).
discussed Cited "see" Aaron Raiser v. City of Murrieta
C.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cato, 70 22 F.3d at 1107–11; see also Moss v. U.S. Secret Serv., 572 F.3d 962, 972 (9th Cir. 2009). 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 1 V. 2 DISCUSSION 3 A. THE TAC FAILS TO STATE A FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 4 EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANTS JACOB, 5 DOE 3, AND CITY OF MURRIETA 6 In Claim Four, Raiser alleges he was denied equal protection of the laws under 7 the Fourteenth Amendment because defendants Jacob and City of Murrieta 8 intentionally treated him differently than other similarly situated in the City of 9 Murrieta “who can drive, park and sit in their cars on city street…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
D. Conn. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 , 116 S.Ct. 1384, 1387-88 , 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996); see also Al-Site Corp. v. Bonneau Co., 22 F.3d 1107 (Fed.Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
D. Conn. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 , 116 S.Ct. 1384, 1387-88 , 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996); see also Al-Site Corp. v. Bonneau Co., 22 F.3d 1107 (Fed.Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Inline Plastics Corp. v. Tenneco Packing Corp.
D. Conn. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Accordingly, “the only way to interpret the term ‘shoulder structure’ is in view of what is shown in the drawings, that is, ‘[a structure] with definite breaks or sharp edges serving as boundaries of a linear or planar surface.’ ” Tenneco responds that “the specification provides additional information, illuminating the fact that a ‘shoulder’ is merely a projection from the opposite ends of the latch, for keeping something in place or preventing movement past the projection.” The court concludes that the term shoulder structure, as used in both the specification and claim 1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Valerie Stringer-Earnest
v.
Department of the Navy
94-3194.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Mar 31, 1994.
22 F.3d 1107
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

22 F.3d 1107
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Valerie STRINGER-EARNEST, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent.

No. 94-3194.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 1994.

1

60 M.S.P.R. 593.

2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ORDER

3

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

4

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.