Edward Robert Wade v. Duane Shillinger, Warden, 24 F.3d 252 (9th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Edward Robert Wade v. Duane Shillinger, Warden, 24 F.3d 252 (9th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Delaware v. Madison. (delsuperct, 2015-03-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State of Delaware v. Madison.
Del. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See supra note 11. 27 See United States v. Tanner, 24 F.3d 252 (9th Cir. 1994), as amended on denial of reh'g (Aug. 8, 1994) (finding “the mere fact of a prior supervisory relationship does not disqualify a judge from presiding over a case in which a former employee is an attorney”); Smith v. Pepsico, Inc., 434 F. Supp. 524, 525 (S.D.
discussed Cited "see" State of Delaware v. Madison.
Del. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See supra note 11. 27 See United States v. Tanner, 24 F.3d 252 (9th Cir. 1994), as amended on denial of reh'g (Aug. 8, 1994) (finding “the mere fact of a prior supervisory relationship does not disqualify a judge from presiding over a case in which a former employee is an attorney”); Smith v. Pepsico, Inc., 434 F. Supp. 524, 525 (S.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward Robert Wade
v.
Duane Shillinger, Warden
93-35981.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 21, 1994.
24 F.3d 252
Published

24 F.3d 252
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Edward Robert WADE, Petitioner-Appellant.
v.
Duane SHILLINGER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-35981.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1994.[*]
Decided April 21, 1994.

Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM[**]

2

Edward Robert Wade, a former Washington state prisoner, filed pro se an appeal challenging the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition. Since filing his appeal, Mr. Wade died. Consequently, we dismiss his appeal as moot.

3

DISMISSED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3