green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Kates v. United States
See United States v. Kates, 27 F.3d 559 (3d Cir. filed May 23, 1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cathy v. Palma
Nov. 25, 2019) 24 (finding allegations that correctional officer deliberately pinned prisoner’s head in steel 25 cell door while he reached for a roll of toilet paper sufficient to “state[ ] a colorable 26 excessive force claim” under the Eighth Amendment); see also Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 27 F.3d 559 , 567‒68 (9th Cir. 2005) (“Within the prison context, a viable claim of First 28 Amendment retaliation entails five basic elements: (1) An assertion that a state actor took 1 some adverse action against an inmate (2) because of (3) that prisoner’s protected conduct, 2 and that such ac…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Dass (Dr. Mulk Raj), A/K/A Dr. Dass
v.
Dass (Dr. Mulk Raj), A/K/A Dr. Dass
92-5547.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 6, 1994.
Published
U.S.
v.
Dass (Dr. Mulk Raj), a/k/a Dr. Dass
NO. 92-5547
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
May 06, 1994
1
Appeal From: D.N.J.
2
AFFIRMED.