Wallace v. Fischer, 27 F.3d 565 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Wallace v. Fischer, 27 F.3d 565 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“serious strike misconduct" described as including "rock throwing, threats of physical harm, and' attempted vandalism with 'jack rocks'.”
10 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alcan Rolled Products Ravenswood v. Terry W. McCarthy (wva, 2014-10-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Alcan Rolled Products Ravenswood v. Terry W. McCarthy
W. Va. · 2014 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
serious strike misconduct" described as including "rock throwing, threats of physical harm, and' attempted vandalism with 'jack rocks'.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edward Charles Wallace
v.
Lieutenant Fischer Corporal Jones Correctional Officer Leach Captain Druckenmiller Lieutenant Green Al Cannon, Sheriff, and State of South Carolina the City of North Charleston
94-6381.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 22, 1994.
27 F.3d 565

27 F.3d 565

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward Charles WALLACE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant FISCHER; Corporal Jones; Correctional Officer
Leach; Captain Druckenmiller; Lieutenant Green;
Al Cannon, Sheriff, Defendants Appellees,
and
State of South Carolina; the City of North Charleston, Defendants.

No. 94-6381.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 22, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-214)

Edward Charles Wallace, appellant pro se.

Sandra J. Senn, Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wallace v. Fischer, No. CA-93-214 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED