Martin H. Tonn v. Jack Forsberg Donald G. Russell Judith Screaton Joseph D. Wyssmann United States of Am., 27 F.3d 1356 (8th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Martin H. Tonn v. Jack Forsberg Donald G. Russell Judith Screaton Joseph D. Wyssmann United States of Am., 27 F.3d 1356 (8th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin H. TONN, Appellant,
v.
Jack FORSBERG; Donald G. Russell; Judith Screaton; Joseph D. Wyssmann; United States of America, Appellees
94-1082.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Aug 26, 1994.
27 F.3d 1356
Appellant, pro se., Gary R. Allen, Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellees.
Fagg, Wollman, Arnold.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Martin H. Tonn appeals the district court’s dismissal of Tonn’s Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) action against Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees who audited partnerships in which Tonn held financial interest. See Tonn v. United States, 847 F.Supp. 711, 716-18 (D.Minn.1993). Tonn contends that Bivens provides a remedy for taxpayers against IRS employees for their tax assessment and collection activities. Tonn’s contention, however, is foreclosed by this court’s contrary holding in Venues v. An Unknown Number of Unidentified Agents of United [*1357] States, 26 F.3d 1448, 1463-1454 (8th Cir.1994). We thus affirm the district court, See 8th Cir.R. 47B.