United States v. Kevin Ronald Adams, 30 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Kevin Ronald Adams, 30 F.3d 131 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Guerrero (ksd, 2005-06-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Guerrero
D. Kan. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Crews, 30 F.3d 131 , 1994 WL 396339, *1 (4th Cir.1994) (affirming finding of voluntary consent where defendant said nothing in response to request to search his person, but raised his hands to one side, in a manner and presentation as if he were opening up his arms.) Even when a defendant verbally refuses consent, his subsequent or contemporaneous actions may be found sufficient to constitute consent.
cited Cited "see" In Re Pilz Compact Disc, Inc.
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 1999 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, e.g., In re Terjen, 30 F.3d 131 (4th Cir.1994) (Table), 1994 WL 411603, *1 ; Matter of Popp, 166 B.R. 697, 699 (Bankr.D.Neb.1993) (citing, inter alia, to Brown v. O’Keefe).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Kevin Ronald Adams
93-6685.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jul 14, 1994.
30 F.3d 131
Unpublished

30 F.3d 131

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Kevin Ronald ADAMS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6685.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 1994.
Decided: July 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-89-434-S, CA-93-1723-S)

Kevin Ronald Adams, Appellant Pro Se.

Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant Adams in forma pauperis status, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adams, Nos. CR-89-434-S; CA-93-1723-S (D. Md. June 14, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED