Martinez v. United States, 33 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Martinez v. United States, 33 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Connaughton v. Mount Vernon City School District (nysd, 2024-04-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Connaughton v. Mount Vernon City School District
S.D.N.Y. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Evans v. Waldorf–Astoria Corp., 827 F.Supp. 911, 913 (E.D.N.Y. 1993) (holding that a period of hours was sufficient to review and sign off on release), aff'd 33 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1994).
cited Cited "see" Murphy v. Inst. of Int'l Educ.
2d Cir. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Evans v. Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 827 F. Supp. 911, 914 (E.D.N.Y. 1993), aff’d, 33 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 1994); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 175 (Am.
discussed Cited "see" Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bay Ridge Toyota, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Evans v. Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 827 F.Supp. 911 , 914 n. 1 (E.D.N.Y.1993), aff'd, 33 F.3d 49 (2d Cir.1994) (“United States District Courts have jurisdiction to enforce the voluntary settlement of Title VII claims”); Montalvo v. U.S. Postal Serv., 887 F.Supp. 63, 65 (E.D.N.Y.1995), aff'd, 1996 WL 935448 , at *1 (2d Cir. Apr 19, 1996) (“Courts directly considering the nature of a cause of action for the enforcement of an EEOC agreement have concluded that district court jurisdiction is derived from Title VII”); Vazquez v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., 2003 WL 21242902 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nikci v. Quality Building Services
S.D.N.Y. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
As an initial matter, Nikci’s claim that Local 32BJ breached its duty of fair representation by coercing him into entering the settlement agreement fails because “a party to a contract cannot invoke a duress defense where his own advisor or representative pressured him into acceptance of a deal.” Mandavia v. Columbia Univ., 912 F.Supp.2d 119, 128 (S.D.N.Y.2012); see also Evans v. Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 827 F.Supp. 911, 914 (E.D.N.Y.1993), aff 'd, 33 F.3d 49 (2d Cir.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martinez
v.
United States
93-2639.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jul 25, 1994.
33 F.3d 49
Published

33 F.3d 49

Martinez
v.
U.S.

NO. 93-2639

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

July 25, 1994

1

Appeal From: D.Conn.

2

AFFIRMED.