green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thurman
See, United States v. Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 683-84 (6th Cir.2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 984 , 130 S.Ct. 1720 , 176 L.Ed.2d 201 (2010) (Officer’s testimony admissible to the extent that it merely ‘alluded to’ the confidential informant’s statement for background purposes of ‘explaining how certain events came to pass or why the officers took the actions they did’ in searching the residence identified by the informant.) (citing Cromer, 389 F.3d at 676 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Outlaw
See id., 258–60; see also United States v. Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 689 (6th Cir. 2009) (prosecutor should not refer to witness protection program unless need for protection is ‘‘obvi- ous, relevant, [or] made an issue by defense counsel’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 984 , 130 S. Ct. 1720 , 176 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Outlaw
See id., 258–60; see also United States v. Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 689 (6th Cir. 2009) (prosecutor should not refer to witness protection program unless need for protection is ‘‘obvi- ous, relevant, [or] made an issue by defense counsel’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 984 , 130 S. Ct. 1720 , 176 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bermudez
See, e.g., United States v. Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 689 (6th Cir. 2009) (prosecutor should not refer to witness protection program unless need for protection is obvious, relevant, or made an issue by defense counsel), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 984 , 130 S. Ct. 1720 , 176 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Smith
See United States v. Gardner, 488 F.3d 700, 710 (6th Cir.2007) (“[T]his court does not weigh the evidence, consider the credibility of witnesses, or substitute its judgment for that of the jury.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. Paige, 470 F.3d 603, 608 (6th Cir.2006) (“[A]ttacks on witness credibility are simple challenges to the quality of the government’s evidence and not the sufficiency of the evidence.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 681 (6th Cir.2009) (“[0]n appeal, there is no place for arguments regar…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James L. Rudzavice
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 09-8705.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 2010.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 586 F.3d 310.