Barnett v. United States, 176 L. Ed. 2d 214 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Barnett v. United States, 176 L. Ed. 2d 214 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tomlin v. Patterson (alsd, 2018-04-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Tomlin v. Patterson
S.D. Ala. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See (Doc. 48, pp. 18–19). “[T]he standard of review under AEDPA cannot be waived by the parties.” Gardner v. Galetka, 568 F.3d 862, 879 (10th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 993 (2010); see also Eze v. Senkowski, 321 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2003) (holding that AEDPA deference “is not a procedural defense, but a standard of general applicability for all petitions filed by state prisoners after the statute’s effective date presenting claims that have been adjudicated on the merits by a state court”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vincent Barnett
v.
United States
No. 09-7007.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 214
Published

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 332 Fed. Appx. 324.