Ryan v. Nash, 176 L. Ed. 2d 224 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Ryan v. Nash, 176 L. Ed. 2d 224 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Steele (ca2, 2018-04-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Steele
2d Cir. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although the district court did not specifically cite Rule 403 in its analysis, “[w]e do not require a district court ‘to articulate the relevant considerations on the record,’ and we ordinarily assume that such due consideration was given.” United States v. Morgan, 786 F.3d 227, 232 (2d Cir. 2015) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Oberoi, 547 F.3d 436, 455 (2d Cir. 2008) (observing “the decision ‘must be affirmed if the result is correct although the lower court relied upon a wrong ground or gave a wrong reason’” (quoting SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 88 (1943…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
v.
Viva Leroy Nash
No. 09-686 (R46-011).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 15, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 224
Published

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to this Court’s Rule 46.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 1048.