McCullen v. Coakley, 559 U.S. 1005 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
McCullen v. Coakley, 559 U.S. 1005 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2022–2025 · …avoiding waiver requires more than a hint that a particular theory may be lurking; it necessitates some developed argumentation addressed to that particular theory ⚠ not in text
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Massachusetts Premier Soccer LLC D/B/A Global Premier Soccer v. Burns & Levinson LLP and Perry A. Henderson, Jr.
Mass. Super. Ct. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
avoiding waiver requires more than a hint that a particular theory may be lurking; it necessitates some developed argumentation addressed to that particular theory
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Adrienne E. Cohen, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bret A. Cohen v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP
Mass. Super. Ct. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
avoiding waiver requires more than a hint that a particular theory may be lurking; it necessitates some developed argumentation addressed to that particular theory
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company v. Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and Biostage, Inc.
Mass. Super. Ct. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
avoiding waiver requires more than a hint that a particular theory may be lurking; it necessitates some developed argumentation addressed to that particular theory
discussed Cited "see" State v. Leniart
Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Curl, 46 Cal. 4th 339, 360 , 207 P.3d 2 , 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 537 (2009) (trial court did not abuse discretion in precluding expert testimony on methods used by jailhouse informants to fabricate testimony), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1009 , 130 S. Ct. 1881 , 176 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Leniart
Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Curl, 46 Cal. 4th 339, 360 , 207 P.3d 2 , 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 537 (2009) (trial court did not abuse discretion in precluding expert testimony on methods used by jailhouse informants to fabricate testimony), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1009 , 130 S. Ct. 1881 , 176 L.
cited Cited "see" McCullen v. Coakley
1st Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullen v. Coakley (McCullen I), 571 F.3d 167 (1st Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1881 , 176 L.Ed.2d 362 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Matthews
N.D.N.Y. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; see also Brown v. Greene, 577 F.3d 107, 110 (2d Cir.2009), cert. denied, Brown v. Rock, 559 U.S. 1031 , 130 S.Ct. 1881 , 176 L.Ed.2d 403 (2010). “[A] ‘reasonable probability’ of a different result is a ‘probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’ ” Wilson v. Mazzuca, 570 F.3d 490, 502 (2d Cir.2009) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ). 1.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bielunas v. F/V Misty Dawn, Inc.
1st Cir. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McCullen v. Coakley, 571 F.3d 167 , 182 & n. 3 (1st Cir.2009) (deeming waived arguments hinted at but not developed and addressed to a particular theory), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1881 , 176 L.Ed.2d 362 (2010). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eleanor McCullen
v.
Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts
No. 09-592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2010.
559 U.S. 1005
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: #29,419 of 633,719
Citer courts: Massachusetts Superior Court (3)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 571 F.3d 167.