green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Howard Gaines
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
There is no unwarranted disparity when a cooperating defendant pleads guilty and receives a lesser sentence than a defendant who proceeds to trial, even if that sentence is “substantially shorter.” United States v. Docampo, 573 F.3d 1091, 1101 (11th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 5.Ct. 2342, 176 L.Ed.2d 564 (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
Henry v. State
See Henry v. Florida Dept. of Corrs., 559 U.S. 1050 , 130 S.Ct. 2367 , 176 L.Ed.2d 564 (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
Angel Balbuena v. United States
See United States v. Balbuena, 343 Fed.Appx. 510 (11th Cir.2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1050 , 130 S.Ct. 2341 , 176 L.Ed.2d 564 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Zackary, III
See United States v. Docampo, 573 F.3d 1091, 1101-03 (11th Cir.2009) (holding that there was no unwarranted sentencing disparity where two defendants were not similarly situated), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2342 , 176 L.Ed.2d 564 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffery
See United States v. Docampo, 573 F.3d 1091, 1101 (11th Cir.2009) (“[Djefendants who cooperate with the government and enter a written plea agreement are not similarly situated to a defendant who provides no assistance to the government and proceeds to trial.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2342 , 176 L.Ed.2d 564 (2010); United States v. Perez-Pena, 453 F.3d 236, 243 (4th Cir.2006) (“[Cjomparing the sentences of defendants who helped the Government to those of defendants who did not ... is comparing apples and oranges.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mateen Abdul-Aziz
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 09-7592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 564
Published
Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 337 Fed. Appx. 375.