Neves v. Holder, 560 U.S. 901 (2010). · Go Syfert
Neves v. Holder, 560 U.S. 901 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alief Independent School District v. C.C., Ex Rel. Kenneth C. (ca5, 2011-09-09)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Alief Independent School District v. C.C., Ex Rel. Kenneth C.
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Milner, 583 F.3d 1174, 1196-97 (9th Cir.2009) (“[A] dismissal without prejudice does not materially alter the legal relationship of the parties, because the defendant remains subject to the risk of re-filing.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3273 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1209 (2010); accord Newport News Holdings Corp. v. Virtual City Vision, Inc., 650 *419 F.3d 423, 443-44, 2011 WL 1467183, *14 (4th Cir. Apr.18, 2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Giorgio Foods, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED. 11 BACKGROUND In order to qualify for distributions under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (“Byrd Amendment” or “CDSOA”), 2 an entity must qualify as an “affected domestic producer.” 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a); see also SKF USA, Inc. v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3273 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1182 (2010); Cathedral Candle Co. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 400 F.3d 1352 (Fed.Cir.2005). 3 An “affected domestic producer” is defined as either a “petition…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kelmer Da Silva Neves
v.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General
No. 09-650.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 2010.
560 U.S. 901
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit for further consideration in light of Kucana v. Holder, 558 U.S. 233, 130 S. Ct. 827, 175 L. Ed. 2d 694 (2010).

Same case below, 568 F.3d 41.