green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Missouri v. Ogerta Helena Hartwein
Cir. 2007); see also, e.g., People v. Banos, 178 Cal. App. 4th 483 , 100 Cal.Rptr.3d 476, 493 (2009) (“It strikes us as illogical and inconsistent with the equitable nature of the [forfeiture-by- wrongdoing exception] to hold that a defendant who otherwise would forfeit confrontation rights by his wrongdoing (intent to dissuade a witness) suddenly regains those confrontation rights if he can demonstrate another evil motive for his conduct.”), cert. denied, —- US. , 130 S.Ct. 3289 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1195 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antwan Jackson
Circuit concluded that imposing an exclusive-intent requirement would have the “perverse consequence” of “allowing criminals to murder informants and thereby prevent admission of the informants’ statements — ■ just so long as the criminal could show that the intent was retaliation (which the criminal almost always could do).” United States v. Martinez, 476 F.3d 961, 966 (D.C.Cir.2007); see also, e.g., People v. Banos, 178 Cal.App.4th 483 , 100 Cal.Rptr.3d 476, 493 (2009) (“It strikes us as illogical and inconsistent with the equitable nature of the [forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exc…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roderick Washington
v.
Arnold Schwarzenegger
v.
Arnold Schwarzenegger
No. 09-9637.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 1179
Published
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.